May 12, 2023
City of Salisbury Statement on Chief of Police Search Process:
The city of Salisbury continues the process to find a new chief of police. The planning for the Salisbury Chief of Police search started before the retirement of the former chief in December 2022. Our top priority is to hire the most qualified individual to lead the Salisbury Police Department. Key factors in a successful search and selection process will be a highly-qualified, diverse pool of applicants; input from the community and the police department; and thorough screenings of applicants by Salisbury staff, community stakeholders and the search consultant.
We began the Salisbury Chief of Police search with an internal survey within the police department. The survey was an opportunity for those who work on the front lines to share their input on the Salisbury Chief of Police search. We also hired a search consultant, Merl Hamilton, who has over 30 years of law enforcement experience and previously served as a chief of police.
City Council and the city manager have prioritized engagement and transparency as part of the chief selection process. Community meetings and stakeholder discussions about the Salisbury Chief of Police search were held during the months of March and April with the NAACP, at City Hall, Salisbury Rotary, Downtown Salisbury Inc., Police Chief’s Advisory Board, Salisbury Police Foundation, Livingstone College, Rowan-Salisbury Schools, and with Latino business owners through the Rowan Chamber. During those meetings, the search process was discussed and City Council and the city manager sought input on specific experiences, characteristics, and priority areas for the new chief. Input was also received on questions to be asked of applicants for the position.
In addition to community engagement, all police department sworn and non-sworn employees were given the opportunity to express their thoughts, ideas, feelings, and opinions freely to the city manager and human resources. The responses and questions, shared both by the community and the department, were utilized to develop qualifications and priorities stated in the hiring brochure for this position. They also will be used to develop the questions that will be asked during the interview and selection process.
The application period for the Salisbury Chief of Police opened Wednesday, April 5, 2023 and closed on Wednesday, May 10, 2023. The city recruited nationally for this position. The search consultant also aided in the search, promotion, and recruitment efforts of applicants through professional resources and networking opportunities once the application period opened in April.
The job announcement (Salisbury Chief of Police search brochure) was posted on the following websites:
- City of Salisbury
- International Association of Chiefs of Police
- International City/County Management Association
- National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives
- NC Law Enforcement Women’s Association
- National Latino Peace Officers Association
- NC Police Executives Association
- NC Law Enforcement Accreditation Network
- Indeed
- LinkedIn
- NC League of Municipalities
Now that the application period is closed, human resources, the city manager, the search consultant, and other city staff will evaluate applications. Next, community stakeholders, city staff and the search consultant will meet to discuss and screen qualified candidates through virtual interviews. The goal of this screening step is to select top candidates to move forward to the in-person interview and assessment phase.
Once, the finalists are selected from the screening, in-person interviews and assessments will take place, utilizing the input received during the public engagement forums. This stage will include several interview panels that will evaluate candidates. Community members, former and current law enforcement leaders, city staff and the search consultant will serve on the panels. The search consultant will also evaluate the finalists’ background checks and review social media accounts to aid in the selection.
City Council has been involved throughout the search process providing guidance and engaging with the community. Council will meet with the final candidates to discuss community priorities.
A total of 26 applications were received for this position. The applicant pool is diverse. Additional details regarding the applicant pool demographics will be released as the process continues.
As previously discussed, the goal of this process is to announce the new Salisbury Chief of Police in the summer.
Community members are invited to share their thoughts on the Salisbury Police Chief search process by contacting Anne Little at anne.little@salisburync.gov or (704) 638-5218 or Jim Greene at jim.greene@salisburync.gov or (704) 638-5227.
To view the hiring brochure, visit https://salisburync.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Police/Chief of Police Recruitment Brochure - Final.pdf
March 21, 2023
The City of Salisbury, North Carolina was made aware of online articles posted today in The Guardian and Raw Story publications that mention Salisbury, North Carolina. The young woman’s property is not located in the city limits of Salisbury, and as noted in the article, the Salisbury Police Department was not the responding law enforcement agency. The property is located eight miles from Salisbury. We have reached out to the journalists for a correction to their articles. We are awaiting a response.
February 26, 2023
SRU issues public drinking water notice
Salisbury-Rowan Utilities (SRU) recently issued a drinking water notice to customers following a drop in the removal rate of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in the untreated “raw” water from the Yadkin River. TOC has no health effects. This is not an emergency and does not require customers to use an alternative water supply (e.g. bottled).
FAQ for Total Organic Carbon Violation
- 1. What is TOC?
- TOC stands for Total Organic Carbon. The carbon comes from organic mixtures - like soil and minerals – that are present in the Yadkin River, which is where we get the water that is treated to become drinking water. All water has naturally-occurring organic carbon and it is not toxic or harmful. We treat water to remove some of the organic carbon, but most drinking water, including bottled water, has organic carbon in it.
- 2. What is the TOC test?
- Every three months, Salisbury-Rowan Utilities’ (SRU) employees take a sample of water from the Yadkin River and a sample of water from the water treatment plant and test them both for organic carbon. We compare the amount of carbon in treated water to the amount of carbon in river water to see how much carbon was removed. This gives us what’s called a “Removal Ratio.” Our samples are sent out to a commercial lab. SRU (and the State) receive these results approximately two to four weeks later. This is just one of many tests we use to see how well the treatment process is working; many tests are run more frequently, some as often as every 15 minutes. As of January 2023, we are testing TOC monthly to ensure our treatment process meets water quality standards.
- 3. Can you explain the violation in a simpler way?
- The EPA and State of North Carolina set standards related to water quality. One of those standards requires that we remove a certain amount of the naturally-occurring organic carbon that is in the untreated “raw” water from the Yadkin River. Every three months, we compare the amount of carbon in treated water to the amount of carbon in river water to see how much carbon was removed. This gives us what’s called a “Removal Ratio.”
To be in compliance with water quality rules, we have to have a removal ratio of at least 1.0. Our removal ratio dropped to 0.99 when the fourth quarter sample was collected.
SRU employees immediately investigated to determine why our treatment process did not meet the TOC requirements and determined that the river water had a lot more organic carbon than usual at the time of the sample. For example, there are usually about 2-3 milligrams per liter of TOC in the water before we treat it, but during the time we sampled there were almost 5 milligrams per liter before treatment.
Another factor about why the treatment process did not meet the TOC requirement was that the cooler temperature of the raw water made part of the treatment process less effective. We discovered that the treatment process could be improved by increasing the water’s pH.
SRU employees made changes to the water treatment process on January 8, 2023, to meet the State requirements during the next sampling period. SRU was notified by the State (by phone) on the evening of January 23, 2023 of the pending notice of violation. SRU employees took follow-up TOC tests on January 25, 2023, to confirm the treatment changes had improved TOC removal. On January 25, 2023 our TOC removal rate was 1.07, which met the State’s required removal rate. We are now sampling monthly to ensure ongoing compliance with the removal requirement of Total Organic Carbon.
- 4. Has this ever happened before?
- No, this is the first TOC violation SRU has ever received.
- 5. Why weren’t customers notified before now?
- SRU was not aware that the State would be issuing a notice of violation until January 23, 2023. By then, SRU employees already had made changes to the treatment process. The actual notice of violation arrived at the SRU office via U.S. Mail on February 13, 2023. As this was our first TOC notice at our treatment facility, we waited for guidance from the state on specific wording and the process for proper public notification. SRU coordinated with other city departments on the most efficient way to share the public notice with all of our customers.
- 6. Is/was my water safe to drink and do I need to use bottled water?
- There’s no need to use bottled water. We have already corrected the issue that led to the violation and follow-up water samples meet all State and Federal water quality standards.
Organic carbon doesn’t cause any health effects. We reduce the amount of TOC in water because it can interact with chlorine (used to disinfect the water) and form something called “disinfection byproducts.” Drinking water containing disinfection byproducts in excess of the maximum contaminant level (set by the EPA) may lead to adverse health effects, liver or kidney problems, and nervous system problems, and may lead to an increased risk of getting cancer.
- 7. If my water is safe, why did SRU mail out the violation notice?
- State and Federal regulations require SRU to notify all customers when a drinking water standard is not met, even if the situation has already been resolved.
- 8. I don’t live in Salisbury – why did I receive this notice?
- State and Federal regulations require SRU to notify all customers when a drinking water standard is not met. Since SRU provides water to the East Spencer, China Grove, and Northeast Rowan County water systems, the notice was sent to customers in these systems as well.
- 9. Can you test my water?
- Individual tap water cannot be tested for TOC removal, because it is based on the amount of carbon in our “raw” (Yadkin River) water compared to the amount of carbon in water at the treatment plant, sampled immediately after treatment. Although you can contact a private lab and purchase a test to check your tap water for organic carbon, it wouldn’t provide any information about TOC removal.
- 10. Is there a way I can see the results of other water quality tests SRU performs?
- We publish a Consumer Confidence Report annually; it is available online at https://salisburync.gov/waterreport
- 11.Why was the notice addressed to “resident” and had a return address from a person rather that the City?
The address list was pulled directly from the City’s billing system. “Resident” was used as this is common with mass mailings. In addition, customer data changes daily, so the customer on the account today may or may not be the actual customer when the notice is received, depending on the timing. In the future, will mail out to “SRU Water Customer”.
This is the first time that we have used the ‘mass mail service’ from our vendor that mails out the monthly invoices to the City’s customers. The return address data had several fields that included older data in them (including a former employee’s name); this information has since been updated. The return address is now setup with the ‘City of Salisbury’ as the first line along with the City’s mailing address.
August 5, 2022
Rumor:- There is an active shooter at the Salisbury Walmart.
Fact:- Law enforcement was called to Walmart on Arlington St. following reports of an active shooter. No active shooter. Initial reports are that there was an altercation between three people. A gun was displayed. All three people left the store. No injuries were reported.
July 21, 2022
Statement from the Salisbury Police Department:
The Salisbury Police Department (SPD) is concerned about a news story aired tonight by a local network station.
We feel this story is biased. The SPD cannot withhold information that a defense attorney is entitled or obstruct prosecution. Instead this report tries to cast negativity on the police and criminal justice system meeting their obligation to provide a fair trial to these defendants.
The Salisbury Police Department values those who take great risk to share what they know to help law enforcement combat crime. While we can’t discuss the details of this case, there was nothing out of the ordinary about the account given by the witnesses in this case, and our responsibility to forward the information to the district attorney.
Discovery laws and the judicial process was followed here, however over and above what the law states, all life is precious to us. We will continue our best efforts to protect victims and those who might risk their lives to make our community safer.
October 1, 2021
Statement from the Salisbury Communications Department:
A story recently aired on a North Carolina news station regarding the condition and demolition of some homes in Salisbury’s West End. Not only was some of the information in the story inaccurate, the city’s communications department was not asked to provide comment on the story, which had been a common practice between the news station, reporter and the city. We are working with the reporter to provide accurate information on the status of properties in the West End.
June 3, 2021
Statement regarding Erwin Middle School
A deeply-disturbing video of a racially-charged incident at Charles C. Erwin Middle School in eastern Rowan County is circulating on social media. Erwin Middle School’s physical address is Salisbury, but the school is located southeast of Salisbury in Rowan County. The City of Salisbury has five public schools within its city limits – Overton Elementary, Isenberg Elementary, Knox Middle School, Henderson High School and Salisbury High School.
August 23, 2021
- Rumor:
- The City built Bell Tower Green for $13 million while there are more pressing needs within the City. The Park will be too expensive for people to use.
- Fact:
- Bell Tower Green is currently privately-owned and most of the $13 million was privately funded through donations that the current owners received over the past few years. They city will be purchasing the park for $700,000 with half of the that amount ($350k) provided by the North Carolina Parks and Recreation Trust Fund Grant which is a state funded grant program for cities and counties. The City will be maintaining the park once we receive ownership. The Public Works Department will be handling the day-to-day maintenance of the park with a fiscal year budget of $341,000. The City does not have the budget to pay for a park given the debt payments still associated with Fibrant. Click here to see how your tax dollars are spent: salisburync.gov/Budget.
Bell Tower Green is free and available to all residents in the community to enjoy daily. The only expenses are related to renting an area of the park or the entire park for a private wedding or private event.
July 17, 2021
Statement from Salisbury Police Department:
Law enforcement body camera footage was posted online recently, stemming from an arrest made in July 2019. The video tells the story.
Yes, the officers’ language was strong. The officers made several attempts to gain the cooperation of Mr. Tori Cuthbertson to turn down his motorcycle radio/music and speak with them about the matter. During the interaction, Cuthbertson swung his helmet, striking Officer B. W. Jones in the face.
Cuthbertson was convicted of assault on a government official (misdemeanor) in District Court. After he appealed his conviction to Superior Court, he was again convicted on June 9, 2021 by a jury. He was represented by a defense attorney in his second trial. Cuthbertson has requested an appeal of his conviction to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. The appeal is pending.
Details of the incident have been shared with the Police Chief’s Advisory Board. The Board will be updated on any details available for their review and if the Board sees it necessary, they will request additional information or inquiry into the matter by SPD Administration.
June 3, 2021
Statement regarding Erwin Middle School
A deeply-disturbing video of a racially-charged incident at Charles C. Erwin Middle School in eastern Rowan County is circulating on social media. Erwin Middle School’s physical address is Salisbury, but the school is located southeast of Salisbury in Rowan County. The City of Salisbury has five public schools within its city limits – Overton Elementary, Isenberg Elementary, Knox Middle School, Henderson High School and Salisbury High School.
March 2, 2021
Statement from Salisbury Police Department:
The health, safety and well-being of Salisbury Police officers, human and canine, is our top priority.
The Salisbury Police Department is aware of the video that has been provided to the media depicting a Salisbury officer during canine training but cannot comment in detail because it is an ongoing personnel matter. In accordance with policy, SPD’s review of and response to this matter is and will continue to be thorough and fair so as to provide due process to everyone involved. SPD can confirm that, as a matter of course, the officer has been administratively separated from the canine while SPD conducts its review. The canine was not harmed and is healthy and being well-cared-for.
To ensure integrity of the investigation of this matter an outside agency has been charged with leading the inquiry. This agency is interviewing and reviewing the matter with identified experts in handling canines, including former handlers with other police departments, an owner of a police canine training firm, and internal K9 supervisory staff. While the matter is not complete, it has been determined no Taser was used on the dog at any point by anyone. Any allegation that this occurred is false.
It is important to understand that a police canine is trained to use force against criminal suspects and a handler must ensure they have complete control over the dog at all times so that any use of the canine in the field is appropriate and lawful. When a canine is noncompliant with the handler’s commands, the handler is trained to correct the dog. Canine training tactics and corrective measures can sometimes be alarming out of context. SPD cannot and will not comment about whether the training tactics used in the video were appropriate, because that is still being reviewed. As part of this review we are ensuring our policy, procedures, and training we provide our handlers is appropriate. Again, SPD’s top priority is the health, safety, and well-being of its human and canine officers. The canine involved in this matter is safe, has suffered no effects from this incident, and the officer in this matter will be treated fairly in accordance with SPD policy.
SPD Chief Stokes would request the public allow the police department’s internal review of this matter to finish before drawing any conclusions.
August 6, 2020
A Facebook post, authored by Charles Morris of Las Vegas in early July, falsely states that the Fame statue “guarding over the graves of Confederate soldiers” was removed by the City of Salisbury. As of today, Thursday, August 6, the post has been shared nearly 40,000 times, although multiple commenters tried to inform Mr. Morris that the post is wrong and provide true information. We encourage Mr. Morris and those who are sharing the post to fact check before posting inaccurate information regarding the City of Salisbury. The post has been reported to Facebook, and we encourage our followers to also report the post.
June 4, 2020
Statement from Salisbury Police Department:
Be angry about the racial injustices that take place in this country. We’re angry too. And we’re working on ourselves daily to ensure that we always do the right thing. We value lives. Black Lives Matter.
This lie is hurtful to our Salisbury Police officers who protect this community every day. Some of whom you know personally. Considering the location of where our officers were attacked with rocks on Monday, June 1, on N. Church Street, and how the line was formed following that incident, we understand how it looks. We did not interfere with protestors at and on Fame on early Monday evening. And once the situation soured one block away, we employed gear to protect our officers. The line happened to move in front of the statue until the crowd dispersed. There was no “order given to protect Fame.”
- Rumor:
- Claims that children were "maced" (to suggest that children were maliciously maced in the face by law enforcement).
- Fact:
- Salisbury Police supports the right to peacefully protest, including young people. The protest did not remain peaceful on Monday night as evidenced by photos and video. Later in the evening, Salisbury and support law enforcement officers were attacked with rocks and water bottles by protestors. They were given a warning that the assembly had become unlawful, and that tear gas would be employed if they did not disperse. Officers donned gas masks and deployed three canisters of tear gas to maintain order. It's unfortunate that young people were in the midst of this incident.
- Rumor:
- The gentleman at St. John’s Lutheran Church on Monday night was actually Jeffrey Long.
- Fact:
- The man at St. John’s Church on Monday night was not Jeffrey Long.
June 1, 2020
Statement from Police Chief Jerry Stokes:
A number of rumors continue to be spread in our community regarding protests, riots, “mobs,” city shutdowns, and the presence of the National Guard, following recent events in the country. These rumors do nothing but spread fear and, in some cases, hate in Salisbury. There is no new curfew in the City limits. The National Guard is not in Salisbury. There are no mobs or riots planned in the City limits. We do know that there are planned peaceful protests in the city, and we expect them to remain peaceful. Do us a favor, when you hear this tomfoolery, please direct them to Salisbury’s official social media pages for accurate information.
May 29, 2020
Statement from Police Chief Jerry Stokes:
Salisbury is a diverse community that respects all people and affords everyone the right to peacefully protest. As protesters prepare to participate in a planned, mobile protest tomorrow, May 30, we would like to inform everyone to be mindful that violence, intimidation and intolerance in any form, shape or fashion will not be permitted. Any deviation from this standard will be addressed accordingly.”
April 21, 2020
Statement from Police Chief Jerry Stokes:
"There was false information posted on Nextdoor overnight. SPD did not nor any other police agency conduct any checkpoints. Don't believe those trying to spread hysteria. The officer in question was assisting a car that broke down in the middle of the road."
October 17, 2019
Statement:
A series of misleading social media posts and related comments about a recent event held in downtown Salisbury is currently being shared within our community. The City of Salisbury would like to share its facts surrounding the 2019 event:
The original poster has stated that city officials have removed the person from participating in the planning of the event. The fact is that this person had been fully involved in the planning of the 2019 event, and was an agreeable member of the team until hours after their last planning meeting. The person removed themselves from the planning team, and when asked to rejoin the group, declined. At no time did any member of city staff ask the person to resign.
Wednesday, August 1, 2018
Mayor Heggins’ Statement on the Holiday Caravan Parade Cancellation
I’m disappointed and very saddened about the Holiday Caravan Board’s announcement to discontinue the Holiday Caravan Parade. Please know that Salisbury’s City Council never made a decision to take over the Holiday Caravan Parade or felt pressured to do so. As a local government entity, our priority is to create welcoming and inclusive environments for all. It is my hope we all work together, as a community, and move forward with a renewed commitment to continue this great tradition for the entire Rowan community. My deepest thanks to the Holiday Caravan Board for your dedicated work over the years!
Friday, July 13, 2018
Salisbury Police Statement:
At approximately 11:30 p.m. on Thursday, July 12, Salisbury Police were dispatched to the Harris Teeter Grocery Store located at 850 West Jake Alexander Blvd. in reference to a possible armed robbery. When officers arrived they discovered that a robbery was in progress, and the suspect was holding hostages inside of the store. Officers made contact with the suspect, who was armed with a handgun and attempted to negotiate his peaceful surrender.
While police negotiated with the suspect, he presented a clear threat to harm one of the hostages with the handgun. In response to that threat, one Salisbury Officer fired one shot from his issued rifle, striking the suspect. The suspect was immediately secured and first aid started by officers. All the hostages being held in the store were simultaneously evacuated to safety.
Rowan EMS was on scene for standby and began treating the suspect as well. The suspect was taken to Novant Rowan helipad and transported by helicopter to North Carolina Baptist Hospital in Winston-Salem for treatment of his wound. The suspect is still being treated for his injuries and is in critical condition. There were no injuries to either the hostages or police. The NC SBI will be conducting the investigation into the officer involved shooting and Salisbury Police Criminal Investigations will be investigating the robbery. The name of the Officer involved and the suspect will be released at a later time.
May 31, 2018
Statement:
On Thursday, May 31 at approximately 12:36 p.m. a person entered the First National Bank at 322 E. Innes Street in Salisbury and robbed the location of an undisclosed amount of money. Officers were able to locate the suspect’s vehicle and engaged in a multi-jursidictional vehicle pursuit, which led them to 1101 Mendenhall Street in the City of Thomasville.
Once the vehicle turned onto Mendenhall Street, the driver exited the vehicle and attempted to flee into Anderson RC Hobby Shop.
A citizen attempted to stop the suspect from entering the store. The suspect produced a knife and stabbed the citizen multiple times. The officers then confronted the suspect and more than one officer used their taser to take the suspect in to custody. The tasers proved ineffective. The suspect still in possession of the knife, was shot by a Salisbury Police Officer. An additional suspect is being treated at the hospital for an unrelated medical issue.
The identity of the suspect shot is currently being verified.
Salisbury Police Department
Rowan County Sheriff
Davidson County Sheriff
Thomasville Police Department
May 8, 2018
- Rumor:
- The City is paying funds for children of a certain demographic to swim at Catawba so that they will not have to swim at the Fred Evans Pool.
- Fact:
- This rumor is false. The City of Salisbury does not pay for any child to swim at the Catawba College pool outside of a scheduled camp. In addition, Parks and Recreation camps do not separate children based upon race, ethnicity, religion, or economic status.
February 22, 2018
- Rumor:
- Reports were that a student was planning to commit an act of violence at Salisbury High School on today, Thursday, Feb. 22.
- Fact:
- Rowan-Salisbury Schools (RSSS) staff and Salisbury Police received social media messages from residents regarding a social media post that was not directly related to Salisbury High. The social media post inferred possible violence at “SHS” on today, Thursday, Feb. 22. Residents sharing the post supposed that “SHS” stood for Salisbury High School. Law enforcement investigated and discovered that a social media post directed to “SHS” originated from out of state, with no specific school name for “SHS.” “SHS” schools across the country have received similar notices of the posts. As a precautionary measure, Salisbury Police directed additional officers to the high school as RSSS put Salisbury High School on a Code Yellow lock down around 7:30 a.m. Around 8:45 a.m., the school moved into a code orange lockdown when additional social media posts were being reported. This allowed for a more secure campus while law enforcement and school administrators conducted the investigation. Salisbury Police investigated and found no credible threats to Salisbury High School. The lock down was lifted at 2 p.m. and students were dismissed on time, without incident.
- Rumor:
- A Salisbury High School student was removed from the classroom for making threats of violence at the school.
- Fact:
- No School Resource Officer (SRO) nor any RSSS staff member removed any students from the classroom or the campus due to threats of violence or identified any student making or furthering a threat.
November 9, 2017
Salisbury Police Statement
On Thursday, Nov. 9 at 5:04 p.m., the Salisbury Police Department was notified that an armed robbery was in progress at the Wells Fargo Bank, 866 W. Jake Alexander Blvd. During the robbery, an individual was shot inside the bank.
As officers were en route to the bank, SPD was notified that a vehicle in the area was either the source of shots fired or received shots fired. Later, a vehicle matching the same description was identified traveling at a high rate of speed near Brenner Avenue, Lincolnton and S. Fulton Street, and back towards Jake Alexander Blvd. SPD officers spotted the suspect vehicle and gave chase.
During the chase, the suspect vehicle crashed on Jake Alexander Blvd. Preliminarily, shots were fired, striking the suspect. The suspect has since died. Additional victims have been injured in this incident.
The FBI and SBI are assisting the SPD with the investigation of the bank robbery, officer-involved shooting, and other possible crimes committed by the suspect.
Further information on this incident will be provided as more facts are known.
September 29, 2017
Statement regarding removal of “Fame” statue:
The issue of relocating the statue “Fame” has been a frequent topic of discussion over the past few years, particularly in light of the tragedies in Charleston, South Carolina and more recently in Charlottesville, Virginia.
In 2015, City Council received public comments about the statue for over two hours, with many people speaking for and against the statue’s removal. At the same time a bill was passed by the General Assembly that prohibited local governments from removing or relocating objects of remembrance on public property.
After much discussion and further research, it is our belief that the “Fame” statue does sit on public property, but Innes Street, on which the statue sits, is now a state-maintained street. How much control the North Carolina Department of Transportation exercises over the median is uncertain.
What is clear, however, is that the Hoke Chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy, which is the owner of the statue, was given an easement for the statue and the easement is still in place today.
The State of North Carolina would have to grant permission to the City of Salisbury or the North Carolina Department of Transportation for the statue to be relocated, and the Hoke Chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy would have to give up its existing easement, and grant its permission for the statue to be changed in any way.
September 5, 2017
In response to a recent post currently being shared on Facebook in the Salisbury community, the Salisbury Police Department (SPD) is releasing the following information. Beyond the information listed below, and to allow for a fair trial for all parties, SPD will make no further comment regarding this incident.
SPD was called to the CVS drugstore at 1924 Statesville Blvd. on 8/30/17 at 4:53 p.m. regarding a disturbance.
Once on the scene, officers took statements, escorted one party to the ER for medical evaluation, and gathered other evidence, including surveillance camera footage.
It was determined the reported crimes were misdemeanors, therefore, the officer could not arrest as directed in NC statues because the crimes had not been committed in the officer’s presence.
Upon review of the evidence (including the surveillance footage) with the Rowan District Attorney’s Office, warrants have been obtained by the investigating SPD officer as follows:
- Drew J. John – age 37 of Mount Pleasant, NC – misdemeanor Assault on a Female, misdemeanor Injury to Personal Property
- Shakieyra J. Morgan – age 31 of Asheville, NC – misdemeanor Assault with a Dangerous Weapon
August 25, 2017
Salisbury Police Press Release
On Friday, August 25 at approximately 2 p.m., Salisbury Police Officers located a suspect recently indicted on 2014 murder charges by the Rowan County grand jury. In this case a true bill of indictment was issued for murder.
Officers attempted to stop the suspect’s vehicle on Bringle Ferry Road. As officers approached the suspect’s vehicle, he drove off through residential property, subsequently leading officers on a short vehicle pursuit. Two officers fired multiple shots into the vehicle’s tires in an attempt to prevent the suspect’s escape. The suspect continued to travel through residential property until he crashed in front of a home along E. Lafayette St. The suspect exited the vehicle, fled on foot, and was apprehended after a short foot pursuit.
The suspect, John Calvin Sifford III, 29, was uninjured by the officers’ gunshots. Once processed, he will be booked in to the Rowan County Detention Center. Additional charges are pending.
The Salisbury Police Department has consulted with State Bureau of Investigation, and given the circumstances surrounding the shooting, the organization has declined to review the incident. The officers involved, Sgt. Mike Colvin, and Detective Devin Barkalow, have been placed on administrative duty pending an internal investigation.
No additional information will be released at this time.
August 23, 2017
- Rumor:
- A recent report on a local blog falsely states that there was gunfire inside the Salisbury Police Department building at 130 E. Liberty St.
- Fact:
- While the City of Salisbury chooses not acknowledge the many false and skewed reports from this blog and its "bloggers," this police report seems to have increased attention from the local citizenry. The police report featured was an administrative means of tracking recovered firearms evidence and not that someone was shooting inside the police department as characterized in the blog post.
The City of Salisbury encourages citizens to directly research information for themselves from legitimate sources before sharing assumed information and causing unnecessary alarm among its residents.
August 21, 2017
STATEMENT:
The City has had no discussions about removing the Fame Confederate Monument, owned by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, and located at the intersection of Church and W. Innes Streets in Salisbury.
The City has been under the impression that the 2015 Cultural History Artifact Management and Patriotism Act would prevent its removal. We are currently consulting with NCDOT as to who holds the title to the land in question.
Fueled through social media and private convesations, rumors led residents to gather last night in its vicinity in false anticipation of its removal. As a reminder, any residents interested in gathering in support of the Monument's removal or protection must receive a permit to assemble from the Salisbury Police Department at 130 E. Liberty St.
June 8, 2017
- Rumor:
- The Salisbury Police Department stationed armed guards at Food Lion Stores in Salisbury.
- Fact:
- The City of Salisbury/Salisbury Police Department DID NOT hire or station armed guards at any location in Salisbury.
June 7, 2017
- Rumor:
- I heard that there will be a riot in Salisbury this week or weekend following today's announcement from the Rowan District Attorney's Office regarding the officer-involved shooting.
- Fact:
- The Salisbury Police Department does not have credible evidence at this time that riots will occur in our City. It does your neighbors an injustice to share this information with your friends, family and neighbors via social media, telephone or in-person as fact. Again, we encourage our residents to seek factual information from reliable sources.
May 30, 2017
Dear Justice in Salisbury Group:
Thank you for your correspondence to City of Salisbury officials received via email at 4 p.m., Friday, May 26, in response to our request of various community stakeholders to discuss the upcoming Rowan County District Attorney’s decision regarding the Ferguson Laurent Jr. officer-involved shooting. Officials are declining this invitation.
For nearly seven months, the City of Salisbury and Salisbury Police Department have come under scrutiny regarding the Laurent shooting – and rightly so. Whenever a police tactic results in a death of a citizen, the community deserves a full investigation, transparency and truth from all those involved.
However, the proliferation of false information surrounding this incident spread by members of your organization, the question of Police Chief Jerry Stokes’ credentials, the continued, unlawful request to direct the Chief to suspend the use of knock and announce warrants, and requests of information specifically known not to be in the City’s possession, is disappointing.
Specifically:
Following Mr. Laurent’s death, Chief Jerry Stokes immediately called a meeting of stakeholders to share as much information as he was able with community members to help calm tensions. At that time, Chief shared with the group that the State Bureau of Investigations (SBI) was in charge of the investigation going forward. He also stated that the information he provided was preliminary at best, including the number of gunshots fired.
On Thursday March 9, Salisbury –Rowan NAACP President Gemale Black emailed a letter to me falsely stating that Police Chief Stokes had “not successfully completed the requirements of the N.C. Basic Law Enforcement class after multiple attempts.” And “that due to numerous absences, he was advised that he would be removed from the course altogether.” This highly inaccurate and inflammatory letter was forwarded to members of the media. City staff spent an unnecessary amount of effort combatting this false narrative.
The known fact was that Chief Stokes was still an active member of the class as of the date of the letter. The Chief was never “advised that he would be removed from the class” nor “had he taken the class after multiple attempts.” Chief Stokes took and passed the exam on Friday, May 12, and graduated from BLET on Wednesday, May 24. This fact is and was known to your organization back in March through present.
Salisbury Police Chief Jerry Stokes is a highly qualified law enforcement officer with more than 32 years experience. He is keenly aware of and has researched how to use the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. He also was the only police chief candidate who had a clear vision for the Salisbury Police Department’s community policing program.
Yet, in your latest letter, you continue to ask about Chief Stokes’ credentials as an accredited law enforcement official. Chief Stokes is a fully accredited law enforcement officer, with full arrest powers, through the N.C. Department of Justice Standards Division. In addition, completion of the N.C. BLET course is not a requirement to serve as a North Carolina Police Chief. No additional questions will be answered regarding Chief’s qualifications as Salisbury Police Chief.
The news media, Salisbury stakeholders and the general public received a copy of the statement from the N.C. Attorney General, which stated that a local government agency cannot restrict law enforcement tactics that are outlined in the N.C. state statute.
However, the Salisbury Police Department has enacted additional measures should they choose to utilize knock and announce warrants in the future. Those measures include additional implicit bias, de-escalation skills and other training for all officers, oversight and final approval by Chief Stokes and Major Barnes to obtain future knock and announce warrants, and requirements that every first-responder police officer in the department wear body cameras, including those on the Special Response Team. These measures were shared last week with the small group meeting attendees.
It has been announced to members of the media, various community groups and residents, in public and in one-on-one conversations, in multiple instances, that the City of Salisbury DOES NOT have the SBI report on the Laurent shooting. Members of Justice in Salisbury are well aware of that fact and were told the SBI would handle EVERY aspect of the shooting investigation, and that the report would be sent directly to the Rowan County D.A.’s office once completed.
Yet, your group members continue to spread this false information. We will no longer address any additional questions regarding this report, its origination or its current location until the D.A. releases the report. In the meantime, any additional questions regarding the Laurent shooting should be addressed to the D.A. or the SBI.
Finally, a series of small group meetings were held on Thursday, May 25 and Friday, May 26. The meetings were held in small groups in an effort to provide all stakeholders an opportunity to speak and share their own individual thoughts and concerns. In a setting of 30+ individuals, an opportunity for all to share their opinions would be near impossible and unfair to other attendees.
Some members of Justice in Salisbury initially agreed to attend these small group meetings including during follow-up, confirmation telephone calls. On the first day of this engagement, your members declined to attend these meetings.
Our objective is and always will be the health, safety and well-being of the Salisbury community. Despite your refusal to meet with city administration, we are still open to communicating with your group at a later date for the betterment of our community.
Warmest Regards,
W. Lane Bailey
May 11, 2017
- Rumor:
- Why did the trees along the 100 block of W. Innes St. need to be cut down during the sidewalk construction project?
- Fact:
- This project is to rebuild and enhance sidewalks along Innes St. Sidewalks have deteriorated in this area and show a lack cohesiveness with the other areas of downtown. We are replacing concrete sidewalks with a mix of concrete and brick pavers and also replacing street trees as they’ll be severely damaged during the construction process.
- Rumor:
- The trees are being cut down and not going to be replaced.
- Fact:
- Trees will be replanted in the fall. The summer heat is too stressful to transplant large trees. Our Tree Board has selected Bosque Lacebark Elms as a replacement tree. A local tree farm has these exact trees and we’ll work them to move the trees as soon as the weather cools. We are also adding engineered soil and expanding the tree pits for the new elm trees. These pits will be under the new pavers and be over 20’ wide. We are working with the Carolina Stalite Company which is a local company on the installation of these new pits. A detail of the new tree pits is attached.
- Rumor:
- Why couldn’t we work around the existing trees? From the Salisbury Post: When Chad Vriesema of Central Piedmont Builders was turning the Bernhardt Hardware Building on North Main Street into shops and apartments a few years ago, he wanted to remove the sidewalk trees to clear the way for construction, according to Rodney Queen, formerly of the city’s tree board. The board denied Vriesema’s request and he proceeded with the trees intact. “He did a great job working around them,” Queen says.
- Fact:
- CP Builders did do a great job working around the trees when they renovated the Bernhardt Hardware Building. Our project is renovating the sidewalks which is totally different. Instead of working inside a building, our work consists of excavating the sidewalks and the subgrade. Unfortunately this work will severely damage the tree’s root system and ultimately kill the tree.
- Rumor:
- Why can’t we have large oak trees like Greenville, SC?
- Fact:
- We can have large oak trees like Greenville, SC if we provide the proper infrastructure to support them. Due to the high volume of traffic on Innes Street we are limited on how large the sidewalks can be. Unfortunately this space is too small to accommodate large oak trees as their roots would damage our historic downtown buildings. Staff is always looking for opportunities to improve our urban tree canopy. Should an opportunity arise that would allow for the proper infrastructure to be installed staff will make every effort to enhance our urban tree canopy.
March 24,2017
- Rumor:
- Lane Bailey sent an internal memo to Salisbury city staff forbidding them to attend the Stop the Violence Summit held on Saturday, March 18.
- Fact:
- No such memo was sent and no such directive was given to any City of Salisbury employee regarding the Stop the Violence Summit held on Saturday, March 18. The City has partnered with Rowan County and the Rowan-Salisbury School System to create a series of four community action meetings. Two of the meetings are in the evening and two are on Saturdays, and as the City Manager explained to Al Heggins in an email, he could not specifically require staff to attend her event because of the time that will be spent on the four events already planned. In regards to Chief Stokes absence, he had previously shared that he would not be in attendance. He recently had surgery and was on medical leave.
March 20,2017
- Rumor:
- Salisbury Police Chief Jerry Stokes failed his Basic Law Enforcement Training exam and does not have arrest powers in the state of North Carolina.
- Fact:
- Salisbury Police Chief Jerry Stokes remains a student in the Basic Law Enforcement Training class at Rowan-Cabarrus Community College. The exam mentioned above will be administered to students in May 2017. Currently, Chief Stokes has arrest powers in the state of North Carolina through August 2017.
Chief Stokes has more than 30 years experience and 3,000 hours of documented law enforcement training, and most recently served as a deputy chief in Lynchburg, Virginia. There, he was a fully-certified police officer.
The N.C. Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards recognizes the certification and training of law enforcement officers from other states on a probationary period, provided the officer’s experience and training records are sufficient. During the probationary period, the officer must complete 90 hours of study in North Carolina law as outlined in N.C. Justice Standards.
In compliance with the general statutes of the state of North Carolina and specifically the Rules of Chapter 9 to Title 12 of the NC Administrative Code, Chief Stokes has been provided with a probationary certification as a fully-sworn law enforcement officer, who is able to enforce the laws of the state.
The City of Salisbury encourages residents to seek truth for themselves and not engage in false narratives that have no basis or foundation in Fact.
January 19,2017
- Rumor:
- The Salisbury Police Department is ignoring eyewitness statements that multiple officers fired and that Laurent never fired.
- Fact:
- The shooting took place within the residence on E. Lafayette St. Only three individuals were present in the home when the Salisbury Police Department entered, including Mr. Laurent. Any additional interviews conducted by the SBI were of individuals outside of the residence.
- Rumor:
- Multiple people walked through the crime scene.
- Fact:
- The crime scene is noted as the residence of 625 E. Lafayette St. Only members of law enforcement were in the residence during the investigation.
From the time officers arrived on scene, members of law enforcement were stationed on either side of the police caution tape along the 600 block of E. Lafayette St. Everyone who crossed the police line was required to provide their name, title, telephone number, including residents who lived in the immediate vicinity of 625 E. Lafayette.
- Rumor:
- The City of Salisbury has not been truthful and transparent about the shooting death of Ferguson Laurent Jr.
- Fact:
- The City of Salisbury and the Salisbury Police Department have provided the public with as much information and documentation as they can provide in the midst of this on-going investigation. As stated two months ago, the City of Salisbury and the Salisbury Police Department cannot comment any further than the already provided information so as not to interfere with the on-going SBI investigation.
City of Salisbury Statement:
The City of Salisbury is aware that members of the Salisbury community held a news conference today regarding the autopsy of Ferguson Laurent Jr.
We have stated since November 4, that once we provided the initial, preliminary information, that we would have no further comment on this incident until the SBI concluded its investigation of this officer-involved shooting. It would be highly inappropriate for the Salisbury Police Department or the City of Salisbury to comment on an on-going investigation, particularly an investigation this important to our community.
Unfortunately, as we wait for the SBI investigation to conclude, assumptions, accusations and misinformation have been shared with the public and the news media. Multiple pages of information regarding Mr. Laurent, the officer involved, the search warrant and the items recovered from the home, were provided to members of the public and the news media from the city in the spirit of truth and transparency. The characterization that we are being secretive or not forthcoming is highly inaccurate. We continue to stand by the decision to not comment at this time until the SBI investigation is concluded.
However, there were some points made at the news conference that we would like to clarify:
Initial reports on the day of the shooting were that Mr. Laurent was shot two times by Officer Boehm. After further investigation on the night of the shooting, it was determined that the initial reports on the number of shots were inconclusive. The true number of shots would be provided in the SBI report and the autopsy. This information was shared with on the City’s Rumor Control web page on the evening of November 3 and with members of the public.
On the evening of the shooting, the City and the Salisbury Police Department called together members of the community, including some of the speakers at today’s news conference, to share as much information as we could regarding this incident, again in the spirit of truth and transparency. But more importantly, we recognized that tensions were beginning to rise in our community. We reached out to these individuals for outreach assistance. We answered questions to the best of our ability at that time. We also shared with the group that we could not comment further until the SBI completed its investigation. We have not met with this same group following the first meeting.
The City is not “hiding behind” its Rumor Control page. This valuable tool has been employed to dispute false information that has been shared in the community. However, despite our best efforts, some of these Rumors continue to exist as noted at today’s news conference.
The shooting took place within the residence on E. Lafayette St. Three individuals were present in the home, including Mr. Laurent. The one known eyewitness to the Salisbury Police Department was interviewed. Any additional “eyewitnesses” were located outside of the home and would have been interviewed by the SBI following the canvas of the neighborhood that day. The Salisbury Police Department has no further information about eyewitnesses coming forward to share information.
January 17, 2017
- Rumor:
- Ferguson Laurent was shot 10 times by a Salisbury Police Officer during the service of a warrant
- Fact:
- Numerous reporters failed to read the entire autopsy report that states three of the gunshot wounds “may represent a re-entrance of one of the bullets perforating the right upper arm.” This inaccurate statement has been repeated multiple times in news stories over the past few days. Again, the actual number of shots fired will be released once the SBI concludes its investigation of this matter.
January 12, 2017
- Rumor:
- Ferguson Laurent was shot 10 times by a Salisbury Police Officer during the service of a warrant
- Fact:
- The autopsy report released today by the Office of the Medical Examiner shows that Ferguson Laurent experienced 10 gunshot wounds to various parts of his body, including five in the torso, four to the arm and one to the head. While the autopsy report lists 10 bullet wounds, it does not account for the actual number of shots fired by the officer. Bullet fragments were recovered in the arm wounds and in the case of one wound, no bullet or fragment was found. We will not know the actual number of shots until the State Bureau of Investigations completes its investigation of this shooting incident.
December 8, 2016
- Rumor:
- High Point Police are prohibited by policy from their City Council from using no-knock tactics.
- Fact:
- According to the High Point Chief of Police, Kenneth J. Shultz "According to my knowledge, that information has never been discussed by our Council. We do not have a policy from them that prohibits no-knock tactics. Instead, we comply with state law and can use the tactic in critical cases where it is ruled that the danger to our officers based on factors such as known weapon possession and disposition to harm our officers warrants the consideration for a no-knock warrant. In truth, we seldom utilize such a tactic, but it is a viable option should the level of danger dictate such a response. Related to this, our internal policy does mandate that the Tactical Team be utilized to execute all high risk search warrants where weapons are known or are suspected or where the suspect's actions are considered unusually dangerous."
- Rumor:
- The SPD failed to provide paid security to Firewater Restaurant on Saturday, December 3.
- Fact:
- A representative of Firewater Restaurant contacted the Salisbury Police Department asking for security at 12:30 p.m. on December 2. The Salisbury Police Department is not required to provide security for private events and only do so as a service for the community members willing to pay for an officer. In addition, the request was made with very short notice. No officer could alter his/her schedule in that short time to accommodate the request.
- Rumor:
- Loose leaf collection is increased for those who live in the Country Club Hills area of Salisbury.
- Fact:
- This statement is false. The City of Salisbury is divided into three areas for loose leaf collection per week. Each area receives ONE collection week on a rotated schedule. NO community within the City receives an increased number of leaf collections. The leaf collection map can be found here: 2016-2017 Leaf Collection Map
- Rumor:
- The City of Salisbury is on high alert this weekend.
- Fact:
- Contrary to the false reporting by a community blog, the City of Salisbury is NOT on high alert this weekend. The Salisbury Police Department has no credible information that there will be additional gun violence this weekend. As always, we ask visitors and residents to be aware of their surroundings and take appropriate safety measures to ensure personal security. We continue to encourage residents to research and seek truth from legitimate sources instead of relying on inflammatory websites that seek to incite fear instead of relaying factual information.
- Rumor:
- Prior to Fibrant, the City has 207 sworn police officers.
- Fact:
- The FY06-07 budget included 105 authorized positions in the Salisbury Police Department. The current 2016-2017 budget has 88 positions in the Salisbury Police Department. During this span of time, Animal Control and Telecommunications functions for the City were consolidated at the County level, transferring those positions to the County. Also, the Police Recruiter position was transferred and consolidated within the City’s Human Resources Department. These three levels of service are still being provided to the Salisbury Policy Department and citizens of Salisbury, but under a different area of control. Additionally, there have been some positions during the span of the last 10 years that were temporarily grant funded and authorized in the Police Department. Not all positions in the Police Department are sworn positions, currently we have 81 sworn positions authorized in the FY16-17 Budget versus 82 actual sworn positions in FY06-07. The City’s current and previous adopted budgets, dating back to 2000, can be found at the following link: http://www.salisburync.gov/Departments/FinancialServices/finance/Pages/default.asp
November 5, 2016
- Rumor:
- Officer Boehm only had two year experience on the force and limited drug training.
- Fact:
- Since being employed by the Salisbury Police Department, Officer Boehn has received regular law enforcement in-service training to include:
- Crisis Intervention (2009)
- Drug Investigations for Patrol (2009)
- Control and Arrest Techniques (2010)
- Understanding Cultural Differences (2010)
- Diversity (2010 and 2014)
- Juvenile Minority Sensitivity (2011)
- Arrest, search, and seizure (2011 and 2012)
- Emergency Response Plans (2011)
- Advanced Special Weapons and Tactics (2011)
- Racial Profiling (2011)
- Meth Labs (2012)
- Handling Mentally Ill/Disturbed Persons (2013)
- Field Training Officer Certification (2013)
- Ethics (2014)
- Fundamentals of Evidence Collection (2014)
- Critical Response to Schools (2014)
- Active Shooter (2015)
- Community Policing (2016)
In addition to this training, Officer Boehm has, as required by CALEA standards, been required to review the department’s Use of Force policy annually. His last Use of Force refresher training was completed in June 2016.
Officer Boehm has successfully qualified with his service weapons as required by policy, his last qualification was March 2016.
Officer Boehm was assigned to the SRT in July 2010. As part of that additional duty, he receives regular training in the techniques and tactics employed by the officers assigned to SRT since that time. That training was provided 11 times per year, nearly every month. The Advanced Special Weapons and Tactics training he received in 2011 was a specific training course for members of SRT teams.
November 4, 2016
- Rumor:
- Downtown Salisbury's First Friday Event is cancelled.
- Fact:
- First Friday scheduled for today, Friday, November 4 has NOT been cancelled. First Friday will begin at 5:00 p.m.
- Rumor:
- Tonight's football game between Salisbury High School and North Rowan High School is cancelled.
- Fact:
- The football game between Salisbury High School and North Rowan High School will be held as scheduled. The game will begin at 7:30 p.m.
November 3, 2016
- Rumor:
- I heard there was a shooting in Salisbury.
- Fact:
- Facts are still being gathered regarding this incident.
What we know is at approximately 9:25 a.m. on Thursday, November 3, the Salisbury Police Department Special Response Team, which includes narcotic detectives, served a no-knock search warrant for the residence. The warrant was to search for narcotics, weapons and stolen property. The Special Response Team was used to serve the warrant because the suspects in the home were known to be armed.
During the entry into the home by the officers, one subject fired at least one shot at the officers. Officers returned fired and struck the subject who has since passed away at the hospital.
Medics with the Salisbury Fire Department are members of the Salisbury Special Response Team, and were able to provide immediate medical attention to the subject after the shooting. Additional information will be made available. Due to the circumstances of the incident, SBI is leading the investigation into this shooting.
- Rumor:
- We heard that downtown businesses are planning to close early?
- Fact:
- City staff has not yet heard that downtown businesses are planning to close early. We encourage residents to let the SBI investigation take its course. Those who may want to protest are certainly within their rights to do so peacefully and non-violently.
- Rumor:
- Officer Boehm was previously involved in an officer-involved shooting.
- Fact:
- Officer Boehm was involved in a previous officer-involved shooting in December 2010. In this particular incident, he was involved in a physical altercation with an individual while responding to a suspicious person call. The incident was thoroughly investigated by SBI. The shooting was deemed justified.
- Rumor:
- A neighbor of the deceased has stated that they saw the entire incident.
- Fact:
- There were three people in the residence when the officers entered the home. The shooting took place within the residence. The two other individuals who were in the residence were taken into custody. Any witnesses who have not been interviewed by the SBI, should contact the organization 800-334-3000.
- Rumor:
- I heard that the police shot the person first.
- Fact:
- The information we have received is that the individual fired upon officers and the officers returned fire. Any information to the contrary has not been confirmed as SBI is currently investigating this officer-involved shooting incident.
- Rumor:
- I heard that there were 10 or 12 shots fired.
- Fact:
- The number of shots has not been confirmed as SBI is currently investigating this officer-involved shooting incident. Early reports are that the deceased fired once and the officer returned two shots.
- Rumor:
- The deceased was “left on the ground,” “in the grass,” “laying dead” for 40 minutes, 1 hour, “a long time,” before an ambulance arrived to take him to the hospital.
- Fact:
- This rumor is untrue. The original times for the initial incident were skewed from the initial report. The call for unknown medical came in Rowan County Emergency Services at 9:16. The ambulance was dispatched at 9:17. It was marked enroute at 9:19. Arrived on scene at 9:21. Enroute to the hospital at 9:26. CPR was performed in the ambulance at 9:30.
Frequently Asked Questions regarding the officer-involved shooting on Thursday, Nov. 3.
- Question:
- What happened?
- Answer:
- What we know is at approximately 9:10 a.m. on Thursday, November 3, the Salisbury Police Department Special Response Team, which includes narcotic detectives, served a no-knock search warrant for the residence. The warrant was to search for narcotics, weapons and stolen property. The Special Response Team was used to serve the warrant because the suspects in the home were known to be armed. During the entry into the home by the officers, one subject fired at least one shot at the officers. Officers returned fired and struck the subject who has since passed away at the hospital.
- Question:
- Where was the shooting?
- Answer:
- The shooting occurred in the 600 block of Lafayette Street
- Question:
- Why was this particular home targeted?
- Answer:
- This home was targeted after a three-month narcotics investigation on the home. The search warrant was issued due to the combination of suspected drug activity, weapons in the home and a report of stolen property.
- Question:
- What is a no-knock warrant?
- Answer:
- A no-knock warrant is issued in a possibly dangerous and potentially volatile situation. Only a superior court judge can issue a warrant based on evidence presented. On Friday, November 4, we anticipate that we can provide additional information on the frequency of use and success rate of a no-knock warrant.
- Question:
- What is the individual’s status?
- Answer:
- The person has since passed away at the hospital.
- Question:
- Who was the individual who was shot?
- Answer:
- The deceased is Ferguson Laurent Jr.
- Question:
- To which hospital was the suspect taken?
- Answer:
- Novant Rowan Regional Hospital
- Question:
- Was the incident recorded on officer’s body cameras?
- Answer:
- The Special Response Team incident was not captured on officers’ body cameras. This is a standard practice for this type of event as to not reveal the Special Response Team methods and tactics for gaining entry into potentially dangerous and volatile situations.
- Question:
- What is the name of the officer involved?
- Answer:
- Officer K.H Boehm has been a member of the Salisbury Police Department since March 24, 2008.
- Question:
- Has Officer Boehm been involved in any other police shootings?
- Answer:
- Yes. Officer Boehm was involved in a physical altercation with an individual. The incident was thoroughly investigated by the SBI. The shooting was deemed justified.
- Question:
- What is the procedure for officers involved in shootings?
- Answer:
- Typically, in officer-involved shootings with the Salisbury Police Department, the officer is placed on paid, administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation.
- Question:
- What is Officer Boehm’s current status?
- Answer:
- Officer Boehm is on paid, administrative leave pending SBI’s investigation and the SPD concludes its internal investigation.
- Question:
- How many officers are on the SRT?
- Answer:
- We are not able to comment on the number of our special operations officers.